Given that the Holga, and the cameras Lomo Inc. produce, began as an inexpensive way for folks in China and Russia to capture their own Kodak Moments, the cult popularity they enjoy today is quite amazing. Their following comes from the camera's disability to produce off color, blurry shots that take on the look of an impressionist painting.
Granted, technically stinky photos are hard to come by these days, especially with the advent of the point and I don't have to think digital photography. Moreover, I can see how offbeat, quirky shots would appeal to folks longing for something out of the ordinary. As for myself, I seem to have the ability to produce quirky, out of focus shots unintentionally. Therefore, a Holga for me is overkill; however, I am torn whether or not to experiment with Lomo photography.
Furthermore, I do admit there is something captivating about the simplicity and surrealness of the Holga photos. In addition, many of the Holga websites http://www.michael-bryant.com/ and their photos are truly worthy of a gallery show.
Lastly, the best part is, the camera is cheap. However, processing cost is another story, at least for 120 film.
To save expense, one can choose to shoot with a 35mm back or a Lomo 35mm which drops the costs significantly.
Check around, study up on the different types of Lomo cameras http://www.lomography.com/ available from 170 degree wide angle to Pinhole cameras. If you really want to go retro read up on the Pinhole cameras available today.http://www.pinholeresource.com/shop/home http://www.papercams.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment